BCDU (2014) – imaginação

(BCDU BCDU CASSIN, Barbara (ed). Dictionary of Untranslatables. Princenton: Princeton University Press, 2014 )

We have examined what Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. ’s immediate successors said about the question of the transcendental imagination. In a sense, however, nothing was said, at least according to an important note in Heidegger’s book on Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. ( Kantbuch GA3 GA3
GA 3
GA III
GA3PT
GA3ES
GA3FR
GA3EN Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (1929), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1991. 2. Auflage 2010. , §27 ):

The explicit characterization of the power of imagination as a basic faculty [Grundvermögen] must have driven home the meaning of this faculty to Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. ’s contemporaries. Thus Fichte Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte JOHANN GOTTLIEB FICHTE (1762-1814) and Schelling Schelling
Friedrich Schelling FRIEDRICH WILHELM JOSEPH SCHELLING (1775-1854) , and in his own way, Jacobi as well, attributed an essential role to the power of imagination. Whether in this way the power of imagination as seen by Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. was recognized, adhered to, and even interpreted in a more original way, cannot be discussed here. The following interpretation of the transcendental power of imagination grows out of another way of questioning and moves, so to speak, in the opposite direction from that of German Idealism.

Such a declaration shows us first of all that the “stone thrown into the pond” of Marburg Neo-Kantianism represented by Heidegger’s Kantbuch is nonetheless engaging, secretly but no less “athletically” in a debate with all the interpretations of Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. since 1781, and notably the one that the history of ideas has retained under the name of “German idealism” ( Hölderlin Hölderlin FRIEDRICH HÖLDERLIN (1770-1843). La poesía de Holderlin está sustentada por el destino y la determinación poética de poetizar propiamente la esencia de la poesía. Para nosotros, Holderlin es en sentido eminente el poeta del poeta. (GA39 p. 32) being quickly excepted ), to the point of characterizing Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. ’s work as “an unconquered fortress behind the new battlefront.” Thus it remains to ask in what way “the essence of Einbildungskraft as Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. understood it” could have been so misunderstood and disfigured by his immediate posterity that this question has to be examined all over again from the opposite direction.

We will limit ourselves here to emphasizing that Heidegger’s reading of Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. , like his reading of Hölderlin Hölderlin FRIEDRICH HÖLDERLIN (1770-1843). La poesía de Holderlin está sustentada por el destino y la determinación poética de poetizar propiamente la esencia de la poesía. Para nosotros, Holderlin es en sentido eminente el poeta del poeta. (GA39 p. 32) , accentuates the idea of an essential finitude of the human being, who is a “king of finitude” ( Hölderlin Hölderlin FRIEDRICH HÖLDERLIN (1770-1843). La poesía de Holderlin está sustentada por el destino y la determinación poética de poetizar propiamente la esencia de la poesía. Para nosotros, Holderlin es en sentido eminente el poeta del poeta. (GA39 p. 32) , hymn “To Freedom” ), whereas German idealism emphasized the unconditional nature of the ego of transcendental apperception as Selbstbewusstsein, or “self-consciousness.” The Bild itself thus became the stake in conflicting interpretations that sometimes inscribed it within a spontaneity Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. reserved for the understanding, and sometimes sought to maintain the equal balance of spontaneity and receptivity, of logic and aesthetics. Instead of stressing the thetic character of the Kantian synthesis ( Fichte Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte JOHANN GOTTLIEB FICHTE (1762-1814) and Schelling Schelling
Friedrich Schelling FRIEDRICH WILHELM JOSEPH SCHELLING (1775-1854)  ), Heidegger underlines the essential part played, in every knowing, by sensibility understood not as passivity but as receptivity.

Referring to Kant Kant Emmanuel Kant (Immanuel en allemand), 1724-1804, é um dos autores de predileção de H., um daqueles do qual mais falou. ’s comment cited earlier, Heidegger remarks that

The term Bild is to be taken here truly at the source, as when we say, looking on a landscape, “What a beautiful view!” [Bild] ( Anblick ), or again, in the presence of a gloomy group, “What a sad sight!” [Bild] ( Anblick ). Kantbuch GA3 GA3
GA 3
GA III
GA3PT
GA3ES
GA3FR
GA3EN Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik (1929), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1991. 2. Auflage 2010. , §19