Seinssinn

“… ‘Sinn von Sein’ und ‘Wahrheit des Seins’ sagen das Selbe.” (GA9 GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 , Was ist Metaphysik?, p. 18). See: GA9 GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 , CartaH GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 , p. 84; GA9 GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 , Was ist Metaphysik?, p. 44; Holzwege GA5
GA5BD
GA5CL
GA5WB
Holzwege
GA 5
GA V
HW
CF2002
CB2012
CMNP
Chm Holzwege (1935-1946) [1977] [GA9 GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 ], 2nd ed. (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1952), p. 245. Cf. Sein und Zeit GA2
Sein und Zeit
SZ
SuZ
S.u.Z.
Être et temps
Ser e Tempo
Being and Time
Ser y Tiempo
EtreTemps
STMS
STFC
BTMR
STJR
BTJS
ETFV
STJG
ETJA
ETEM Sein und Zeit (1927), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1977, XIV, 586p. Revised 2018. [GA2] / Sein und Zeit (1927), Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, 1967. / Sein und Zeit. Tübingen : Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1972 , 6th ed. (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1949), p. 151. [RHPT RHPT Richardson, William. J.. Heidegger Through Phenomenology to Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003 :7]

---

This proposal to ground metaphysics by interrogating the sense of Being as the process of ἀ-λήθεια through which the ontological difference [ontologische Differenz] breaks out has been Heidegger’s unique preoccupation since the first pages of Being and Time GA2
Sein und Zeit
SZ
SuZ
S.u.Z.
Être et temps
Ser e Tempo
Being and Time
Ser y Tiempo
EtreTemps
STMS
STFC
BTMR
STJR
BTJS
ETFV
STJG
ETJA
ETEM Sein und Zeit (1927), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1977, XIV, 586p. Revised 2018. [GA2] / Sein und Zeit (1927), Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, 1967. / Sein und Zeit. Tübingen : Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1972 (1927). One must admit, of course, that the focus on the difference [Differenz] as difference becomes sharper in the later years than we find it in the beginning, and the evolution in clarity will warrant very special attention. But the fundamental position is made sufficiently clear as early as the inaugural address of 1929, when the author formulates the ground-question with Leibniz Leibniz LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm (1646-1716). Leibniz centraliza sua reflexão sobre o "tema" que H tem por central em toda filosofia desde Platão e Aristóteles: a questão do ser. (LDMH) ’ formula: “why are there beings at all and not much rather Non-being?” [Warum ist überhaupt Seiendes und nicht vielmehr Nichts?” (GA9 GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 , Was ist Metaphysik?, p. 42)] For Leibniz Leibniz LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm (1646-1716). Leibniz centraliza sua reflexão sobre o "tema" que H tem por central em toda filosofia desde Platão e Aristóteles: a questão do ser. (LDMH) , of course, the formula asks effectively about a Supreme Being that “grounds” all other beings, is therefore eminently a metaphysical question. For Heidegger, the question means: how is it possible that beings (independently of “where” they might have come from, “who” or “what” may have “caused” them, as metaphysics [Metaphysik] understands these terms) can be (manifest) as beings. In other words, it is a question about the coming-to-pass of the lighting-process of ἀ-λήθεια, which we now understand as the emergence of the ontological difference. What is more, it is a question about this process as permeated by negativity. Heidegger himself expands the question thus: “… How does it come about that everywhere [about us] beings have the primacy … while that which is not a being, which is thought of as Non-being in the sense of Being itself, remains forgotten? …” [Woher kommt es, dass überall Seiendes den Vorrang hat und jegliches ‘ist’ für sich beansprucht, während das, was nicht ein Seiendes ist, das so verstandene Nichts als das Sein selbst, vergessen bleibt?..(GA9 GA9
Wegmarken
GA9PT
GA9ES
GA9EN
CartaH Wegmarken (1919–1961), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1. Auflage 1976. 2., durchgesehene Auflage 1996 , Was ist Metaphysik?, p. 23)] The ground-question meditates not only Being [Sein] but obliviousness to Being [Seinsverlassenheit], the forgottenness [Vergessenheit] of the ontological difference. [RHPT RHPT Richardson, William. J.. Heidegger Through Phenomenology to Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003 :14]

---