général
universal

Literalmente: o que é comum (gemein) a todos (all) (N.T.). [Casanova Casanova
Marco Antonio Casanova
Marco Casanova CASANOVA, Marco Antonio. Filósofo e tradutor para português das obras de Heidegger. ; GFOposi:263]

---

Universal, Universality (allgemein, Allgemeinheit, universal, Universalität), 2-4, 38-39, 156, 177-178, 251, 278, 280, 395, 417, 434 (Hegel Hegel
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) ); transcendental u. of being, 3, 14, 38-39, 199-200, 208; validity, 156, 205 n. 15, 227, 395. See also Concept; Existentials; Genus; Individualization; Jeweiligkeit; Transcendentals [BTJS GA2
Sein und Zeit
SZ
SuZ
S.u.Z.
Être et temps
Ser e Tempo
Being and Time
Ser y Tiempo
EtreTemps
STMS
STFC
BTMR
STJR
BTJS
ETFV
STJG
ETJA
ETEM Sein und Zeit (1927), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1977, XIV, 586p. Revised 2018. [GA2] / Sein und Zeit (1927), Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, 1967. / Sein und Zeit. Tübingen : Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1972 ]

---

Authentic Dasein discloses a concrete “situation,” while an inauthentic one knows only the “general circumstances” (allgemeine Lage, SZ GA2
Sein und Zeit
SZ
SuZ
S.u.Z.
Être et temps
Ser e Tempo
Being and Time
Ser y Tiempo
EtreTemps
STMS
STFC
BTMR
STJR
BTJS
ETFV
STJG
ETJA
ETEM Sein und Zeit (1927), ed. Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, 1977, XIV, 586p. Revised 2018. [GA2] / Sein und Zeit (1927), Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, 1967. / Sein und Zeit. Tübingen : Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1972 300). The possibilities articulated publicly by the anyone are general. The inauthentic shoemaker responds to solicitations that any shoemaker in general could take up. [WCHL WCHL

WRATHALL, M. A. The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon. Cambridge New York (N.Y.): Cambridge university press, 2021.

]

---

These praedicabilia are also called universalia. The precise distinction consists in the fact that universale means: unum quod est in pluribus, as opposed to praedicabile: unum quod de pluribus praedicatur. Hence the question of whether the general actually exists in the things or is only the generality of apprehending thought (Realism – Nominalism). This question also has its origin in determinate concrete contexts of Greek philosophy, or better in scholastic misunderstandings thereof. [GA18 GA18
GA18MT
GA 18
GA XVIII Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie (Summer semester 1924), ed. M. Michalski, 2002, XIV, 418p. :16-17]

---